From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce bmv_count in xfs_vn_fiemap
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:19:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5F36FE.4050200@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bzybpnkhp62.fsf@fransum.emea.sgi.com>
Olaf Weber wrote:
> Eric Sandeen writes:
>
>> commit 6321e3ed2acf3ee9643cdd403e1c88605d7944ba caused
>> the full bmv_count's worth of getbmapx structures to get
>> allocated; telling it to do MAXEXTNUM was a bit insane,
>> resulting in ENOMEM.
>
>> Chop it down to something reasonable, the caller can
>> loop over this if the file has > 64 extents.
>
> It does seem to me that this will result in an unusal case for the
> caller, in that it will get fewer extents than fit in the provided
> buffer, yet should loop. Do current callers know that they can hit
> this case, detect it, and loop accordingly? Or is this just pushing
> the problem/regression to userspace?
Well, userspace just keeps calling until it gets FIEMAP_LAST in the
flags. But yeah, I forgot that we were given the nr of user extents,
I'll send a better V2.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-15 19:33 [PATCH] reduce bmv_count in xfs_vn_fiemap Eric Sandeen
2009-07-16 10:56 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-16 14:19 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-07-16 14:48 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2009-07-16 15:18 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-16 19:11 ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2009-07-17 11:46 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-18 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-27 2:52 ` [PATCH V4] " Eric Sandeen
2009-07-27 7:55 ` Olaf Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5F36FE.4050200@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=olaf@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox