From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n6J0j1w6183119 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:45:02 -0500
Received: from Ishtar.tlinx.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DC7B2A93965
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Ishtar.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [64.81.245.74]) by
	cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zsj0AQPBw7ztlGZB for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.11] (Athena [192.168.3.11])
	by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n6J0jd8C010756 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:45:41 -0700
Message-ID: <4A626CB3.8050500@tlinx.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0700
From: "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@tlinx.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: logbuf=<default>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

What's the current default these days for logbufs on mounted disks?

Is it up to 8?  Would there be any benefit in increasing it beyond 8?

Just that memory isn't quite so tight these days as it used to be and
thought the default probably should at least be 8 these days -- and
wondering if increasing the max would be of any benefit...

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs