From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6KHu8x4099362 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:56:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 24E4D3736CB for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 4CrKEZwkOE19fzi9 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A64AFD4.90407@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:56:36 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't fail if nslookup is not found References: <20090719182012.GA10936@infradead.org> <20090720001637.GA31674@infradead.org> <20090720093240.GA24549@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christian Kujau Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Christian Kujau wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 at 05:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Thanks, I've put the patch in and pushed it to the kernel.org >> repository. > > Thanks, Christoph. This reminds me to ask: why is there also a kernel.org > repo, when there's one on oss.sgi.com too? (The latter being referenced in > the XFS wiki) outsiders can't commit to sgi's git repo, so those doing active development can commit to the one on kernel.org, and then sgi periodically pulls those in to oss.sgi.com. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs