From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6KJJ9f5103811 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:19:10 -0500 Received: from pu01.news-service.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0C01210A8B8E for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pu01.news-service.com (ns1.news-service.com [195.114.240.3]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Hh6hfv0K9VOScNZ0 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A64C34F.80807@news-service.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:19:43 +0200 From: Patrick Schreurs MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode References: <4A408316.2070903@news-service.com> <1587994907.388291245745033392.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <20090623171305.GB23971@infradead.org> <4A4A7205.6010101@news-service.com> <20090630204256.GA1891@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090630204256.GA1891@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Tommy van Leeuwen , Lachlan McIlroy , Eric Sandeen Hi Christoph, I saw some patches from your hand on this list ("fixes for memory allocator recursions into the filesystem"). Are these patches related to this issue? Thanks, -Patrick Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:57PM +0200, Patrick Schreurs wrote: >> Hi (again), >> >> Anyone has any advice to prevent this from happening? We've seen 10 >> crashes in the last 14 days. Would it be helpful to enable >> CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG? Does this result in a big performance hit on busy xfs >> filesystems? If we can help troubleshoot this problem, please advice. >> >> If i understand correctly this issue also exists in 2.6.29? Should i >> downgrade to the latest 2.6.28 kernel to regain stability? > > For now please downgrade to the latest 2.6.28, yes. I hope I will have > time and machine ressources to dig deeper into the problem this week. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs