From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n74L3wvg192911 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:04:03 -0500 Received: from ciao.gmane.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 256823A5DBC for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WJ55EpgdmQbLoQnO for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MYRBc-0005w0-Hh for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:04:44 +0000 Received: from adsl-75-61-228-198.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net ([75.61.228.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:04:44 +0000 Received: from kononov by adsl-75-61-228-198.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:04:44 +0000 From: Roman Kononov Subject: Re: failed assertion related to realtime section Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:04:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4A78A260.1040501@ftml.net> References: <4A5E7109.7000808@ftml.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2009-07-16 05:02, Olaf Weber wrote: > A quick test on an available system > running a (much) older kernel runs to completion, so this appears to > be a regression. With which kernel version did you run the test? > Figuring out exactly when/where this regressed will take time. I went back to 2.6.23 and the same assfail happened with somewhat different call trace: Assertion failed: xfs_trans_get_block_res(tp) > 0, file: /home/rk/linux-2.6.23/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5523 Call Trace: [] xfs_bunmapi+0x8e8/0x1060 [] dequeue_entity+0x7a/0xb0 [] xfs_itruncate_finish+0x398/0x5c0 [] xfs_free_eofblocks+0x263/0x2b0 [] xfs_release+0x118/0x1e0 [] xfs_file_release+0x1a/0x30 [] __fput+0xcd/0x1e0 [] filp_close+0x54/0x90 [] sys_close+0x9d/0x110 [] system_call+0x7e/0x83 I tried to go back to 2.6.22.19 and older, and the test did not run at all failing to mount: XFS: bad version XFS: SB validate failed Any suggestions? Roman _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs