From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n753w8pw213677 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:58:08 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4E52EAF44F7 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qTjw3ca65mk8E8XM for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A790380.7060805@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:58:56 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: failed assertion related to realtime section References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Roman Kononov Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Roman Kononov wrote: > Hi, > > In 2.6.30.x Linux kernel, the XFS_RT configuration option does not say "This > feature is unsupported at this time..." any more. Nevertheless, when > enabled, the feature crashes the file system in my setup. Is it expected to > be functional? > > The attached assertion log happens every time with a clean and empty file > system. > > Thanks, > > Roman Kononov While realtime should probably work and not oops (!) I'm curious what your use-case for realtime is? Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs