From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n754Q1TZ215417 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:26:01 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 457C23A732E for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZVH0PA4ppqU0flHe for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A790A09.8050502@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:26:49 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS filesystem shutting down on linux 2.6.28.10 (xfs_rename) References: <1367391532.793061249444829356.JavaMail.root@mail.vpac.org> In-Reply-To: <1367391532.793061249444829356.JavaMail.root@mail.vpac.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Chris Samuel Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Chris Samuel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I believe we've been hitting the same issue that > Gabriel Barazer reported in 2.6.28.9 on the 22nd > of July on our NFS server for our HPC Linux clusters. ... > This kernel is built with XFS as a kernel module so I've > been able to attach the objdump output that Eric Sandeen > had originally requested from Gabriel. I'll take a look. The reason for the objdump was to try to work out where in xfs_rename we were erroring out, but in your case: xfs_rename+0x5ac/0x5af I guess it's the trans_cancel at the very end of the function on the goto : error cases. Is there any chance you could instrument xfs_rename so that for every goto abort_return and goto error_return you add a printk so we know which one you hit? Maybe something like: printk("line %s error %d\n", __LINE__, error); just before each goto, with appropriate braces {} sprinkled in as necessary? I can send a patch if that helps. Sorry for the brute-force debugging but not at all sure yet what this may be. Thanks, -Eric > Like Gabriel we're stuck on 2.6.28.x as the last working > NFS exporting XFS kernel due to kernel bug #13375 (the > radix bug), so I hope this helps! > > cheers, > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs