Re: failed assertion related to realtime section

[Roman Kononov <kononov@ftml.net>]

Olaf Weber wrote:
> A quick test on an available system
> running a (much) older kernel runs to completion, so this appears to
> be a regression.

Did you have the XFS_DEBUG option on? Without it, the filesystem with 
realtime does not die right away, but hangs or crashes later.

> 
>> With which kernel version did you run the test?
> 
> Heavily-patched 2.6.16, which is what I had readily available at that
> point.  But most or all of those patches + additional changes should
> be in current XFS.
> 

Vanilla 2.6.16.19 without the lazy-counters option:

Assertion failed: ((tp)->t_blk_res) > 0, file: 
/home/rk/linux-2.6.16.19/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5452

Call Trace:
<ffffffff801e4b3f>{xfs_bunmapi+1335}
<ffffffff8020c5c0>{xfs_itruncate_finish+769}
<ffffffff8022be3c>{xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks+420}
<ffffffff8022bf40>{xfs_release+190}
<ffffffff80232e27>{linvfs_release+26}
<ffffffff80169c60>{__fput+189}
<ffffffff8016733a>{filp_close+93}
<ffffffff801673db>{sys_close+150}
<ffffffff8010aa2a>{system_call+126}

It looks like it never worked.

Any hope? :-(

Roman

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs