public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds
@ 2009-08-10 14:00 Christoph Hellwig
  2009-08-10 14:19 ` Eric Sandeen
  2009-09-25 20:17 ` Alex Elder
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2009-08-10 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs

Without SMP or preemption spin_is_locked always returns false,
so we can't do an assert with it.  Instead use assert_spin_locked,
which does the right thing on all builds.

This fixes kernel.org BZ #13621.


Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reported-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:07.889729629 -0300
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:24.092725926 -0300
@@ -3180,7 +3180,7 @@ try_again:
 STATIC void
 xlog_state_want_sync(xlog_t *log, xlog_in_core_t *iclog)
 {
-	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&log->l_icloglock));
+	assert_spin_locked(&log->l_icloglock);
 
 	if (iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
 		xlog_state_switch_iclogs(log, iclog, 0);

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds
  2009-08-10 14:00 [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds Christoph Hellwig
@ 2009-08-10 14:19 ` Eric Sandeen
  2009-09-25 20:17 ` Alex Elder
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-08-10 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Without SMP or preemption spin_is_locked always returns false,
> so we can't do an assert with it.  Instead use assert_spin_locked,
> which does the right thing on all builds.

oops!

> This fixes kernel.org BZ #13621.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reported-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
> Tested-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>

> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:07.889729629 -0300
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:24.092725926 -0300
> @@ -3180,7 +3180,7 @@ try_again:
>  STATIC void
>  xlog_state_want_sync(xlog_t *log, xlog_in_core_t *iclog)
>  {
> -	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&log->l_icloglock));
> +	assert_spin_locked(&log->l_icloglock);
>  
>  	if (iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>  		xlog_state_switch_iclogs(log, iclog, 0);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds
  2009-08-10 14:00 [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds Christoph Hellwig
  2009-08-10 14:19 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-09-25 20:17 ` Alex Elder
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Elder @ 2009-09-25 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Without SMP or preemption spin_is_locked always returns false,
> so we can't do an assert with it.  Instead use assert_spin_locked,
> which does the right thing on all builds.
> 
> This fixes kernel.org BZ #13621.

Looks good.

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reported-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
> Tested-by: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:07.889729629 -0300
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c	2009-08-09 23:27:24.092725926 -0300
> @@ -3180,7 +3180,7 @@ try_again:
>  STATIC void
>  xlog_state_want_sync(xlog_t *log, xlog_in_core_t *iclog)
>  {
> -	ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&log->l_icloglock));
> +	assert_spin_locked(&log->l_icloglock);
> 
>  	if (iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>  		xlog_state_switch_iclogs(log, iclog, 0);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-25 20:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-10 14:00 [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-10 14:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-25 20:17 ` Alex Elder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox