From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7DCbW77020987 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:37:42 -0500 Received: from mail.bgs.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id B07583C741A for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.bgs.hu (bgs.hu [195.228.254.245]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id 1PH8LZEdUsGU5ASP for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A84090A.6040601@bgs.hu> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:37:30 +0200 From: Bgs MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: fs change on read-only mount List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: SGI Project XFS mailing list Greetings, I don't know xfs' superblock handling well enough, so I'm asking for advice here: Does xfs write anything on the disk when mounting read-only? Is it possible to use a partitions hash (or some well defined portion of the partition) for integrity checks? The partitions are used read-only and hash would be re-generated if any rw action was done (after remount ro or full reboot of course). Can this be done? I'm concerned about 'mount count' like writes... Thanks in advance Bgs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs