public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: actually issue 0 size writes
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:15:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84ACB1.7070602@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CDE853D-47DB-4E76-8D8F-DA1B77CC1F54@sgi.com>

Felix Blyakher wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> While testing some stuff in generic_write_checks() in the
>> kernel I realized that you can't actually use xfs_io to send
>> a 0-byte write in.  This is actually a condition worth testing:
>>
>>       If  count  is zero and fd refers to a regular file,
>>       then write() may return a failure status if one  of
>>       the  errors  below  is  detected.  If no errors are
>>       detected, 0 will be returned  without  causing  any
>>       other  effect.
> 
> As I understand the desire to be able to issue 0 size writes
> from xfs_io is to test the possibility of writing to a given fd.
> What kind of errors would you expect to test for?

In general EFBIG or ENOSPC.

This sort of thing in generic_write_checks():

        if (unlikely(*pos >= inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)) {
                if (*count || *pos > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
                     return -EFBIG;
                }
                /* zero-length writes at ->s_maxbytes are OK */
        }

Although I'm a little confused about why "*pos == s_maxbytes" is ok; I
thought s_maxbytes was a count/size whereas pos is an offset, so it
seems to me that pos == s_maxbytes is one past the max.  But anyway,
that's mostly unrelated to the patch in this thread.  :)

-Eric

> Otherwise looks good.
> 
> Felix


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-14  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-13 22:15 [PATCH] xfs_io: actually issue 0 size writes Eric Sandeen
2009-08-13 22:52 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14  0:15   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-08-26 22:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 23:26   ` Eric Sandeen
     [not found] <139598026.1934901250211190252.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14  0:56 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14  1:34   ` Eric Sandeen
     [not found] <148381776.1936161250214905902.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14  1:55 ` Lachlan McIlroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A84ACB1.7070602@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=felixb@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox