From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: actually issue 0 size writes
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:15:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84ACB1.7070602@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CDE853D-47DB-4E76-8D8F-DA1B77CC1F54@sgi.com>
Felix Blyakher wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> While testing some stuff in generic_write_checks() in the
>> kernel I realized that you can't actually use xfs_io to send
>> a 0-byte write in. This is actually a condition worth testing:
>>
>> If count is zero and fd refers to a regular file,
>> then write() may return a failure status if one of
>> the errors below is detected. If no errors are
>> detected, 0 will be returned without causing any
>> other effect.
>
> As I understand the desire to be able to issue 0 size writes
> from xfs_io is to test the possibility of writing to a given fd.
> What kind of errors would you expect to test for?
In general EFBIG or ENOSPC.
This sort of thing in generic_write_checks():
if (unlikely(*pos >= inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)) {
if (*count || *pos > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
return -EFBIG;
}
/* zero-length writes at ->s_maxbytes are OK */
}
Although I'm a little confused about why "*pos == s_maxbytes" is ok; I
thought s_maxbytes was a count/size whereas pos is an offset, so it
seems to me that pos == s_maxbytes is one past the max. But anyway,
that's mostly unrelated to the patch in this thread. :)
-Eric
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> Felix
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 22:15 [PATCH] xfs_io: actually issue 0 size writes Eric Sandeen
2009-08-13 22:52 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:15 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-08-26 22:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 23:26 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] <139598026.1934901250211190252.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 0:56 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14 1:34 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] <148381776.1936161250214905902.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 1:55 ` Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84ACB1.7070602@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=felixb@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox