From: John Quigley <jquigley@jquigley.com>
To: XFS Development <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption with failover
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:06:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84B88A.4070701@jquigley.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A84B050.4020500@sandeen.net>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Are you sure?
>
> if (ohead->oh_clientid != XFS_TRANSACTION &&
> ohead->oh_clientid != XFS_LOG) {
> xlog_warn(
> "XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid");
> ASSERT(0);
> return (XFS_ERROR(EIO));
> }
>
> so it does say EIO but that seems to me to be the wrong error; loks more
> like a bad log to me.
Hey Eric:
That would certainly be consistent with our experience, as the only way we're able to bring the file system back online is by zeroing the log.
> It does make me wonder if there's any sort of per-initiator caching on
> the iscsi target or something. </handwave>
There isn't, as mentioned above, though we have several intermediate layers between the file system and iSCSI initiator, including multipath and LVM, both of which I was initially suspicious of. In testing with a similar scenario but in a more isolate fashion without those two intermediates, the behavior was still present. Also, just to clarify the topology:
/-----[Failover Secondary]------\
/ \
NFS Client ----/ \-----[ISCSI Target]----[Distributed Storage]
\ /
\ /
\-----[Failover Primary]--------/
Those two failover machines, Primary and Secondary, act as the NFS server, the XFS mountpoint and ISCSI initiator. Only one failover machine is logged into the ISCSI target/has XFS mounted.
Thanks very much for your cycles on this guys.
- John Quigley
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 20:17 XFS corruption with failover John Quigley
2009-08-13 21:17 ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-08-13 22:42 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:52 ` John Quigley
2009-08-14 0:50 ` John Quigley
2009-08-13 21:44 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-14 0:58 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14 1:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-14 1:44 ` John Quigley
2009-08-14 1:06 ` John Quigley [this message]
2009-08-14 13:21 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:56 ` John Quigley
[not found] <424153067.1934481250210293891.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 0:38 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14 1:14 ` John Quigley
2009-08-17 18:04 ` John Quigley
[not found] <835473717.1935811250214078456.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 1:43 ` Lachlan McIlroy
[not found] <990461759.2142271250648177725.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-19 2:18 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-19 15:46 ` John Quigley
[not found] <1194138654.75921250838215929.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-21 7:11 ` Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84B88A.4070701@jquigley.com \
--to=jquigley@jquigley.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox