From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7E1hvEh065820 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:44:07 -0500 Received: from mail.jquigley.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1C9ED3CAE37 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jquigley.com (main.jquigley.com [67.23.32.156]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OnwMYs8QG2X8xlc1 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.11] (OSH-NAT-213-122.onshore.net [66.146.213.122]) (Authenticated sender: jquigley@mail.jquigley.com) by mail.jquigley.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCACE204116 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4A84C183.2020609@jquigley.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:44:35 -0500 From: John Quigley MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS corruption with failover References: <1405534054.1935051250211481446.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4A84BF5A.8030502@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4A84BF5A.8030502@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: XFS Development Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Should barriers be enabled in XFS then? > > Could try it but I bet the iscsi target doesn't claim to support them... The target implementation, being new, is fairly naive and does not support this (or have any caching facilities, for that matter) at this time. - John Quigley _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs