From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:42:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB4EDBC.9050609@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB300CC.5020707@sandeen.net>
clang found this one too as a "Dead assignment"
Unless my pointer-fu is totally messed up, this function
was never actually updating the list head.
This would mean that the later free_allocations() calls in
incore_ext_teardown() and free_rt_dup_extent_tree() don't
actually free any items, and therefore leak memory.
V2: now with correct pointer-fu.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
---
(We could use Jeff's doubly-linked list patch too, though we
really don't need both pointers, and there are still other
singly-linked lists throughout repair...)
clang record:
http://sandeen.net/clang/xfsprogs/2009-09-09-1/report-1Jnl15.html#EndPath
diff --git a/repair/incore.c b/repair/incore.c
index 84626c9..0fd0e89 100644
--- a/repair/incore.c
+++ b/repair/incore.c
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@
* if set to NULL if empty.
*/
void
-record_allocation(ba_rec_t *addr, ba_rec_t *list)
+record_allocation(ba_rec_t *addr, ba_rec_t **list)
{
- addr->next = list;
- list = addr;
+ addr->next = *list;
+ *list = addr;
return;
}
diff --git a/repair/incore.h b/repair/incore.h
index 1f0f45a..4f90dd6 100644
--- a/repair/incore.h
+++ b/repair/incore.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ typedef struct ba_rec {
struct ba_rec *next;
} ba_rec_t;
-void record_allocation(ba_rec_t *addr, ba_rec_t *list);
+void record_allocation(ba_rec_t *addr, ba_rec_t **list);
void free_allocations(ba_rec_t *list);
/*
diff --git a/repair/incore_ext.c b/repair/incore_ext.c
index a2acbf4..90d2074 100644
--- a/repair/incore_ext.c
+++ b/repair/incore_ext.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ mk_extent_tree_nodes(xfs_agblock_t new_startblock,
do_error(
_("couldn't allocate new extent descriptors.\n"));
- record_allocation(&rec->alloc_rec, ba_list);
+ record_allocation(&rec->alloc_rec, &ba_list);
new = &rec->extents[0];
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ mk_rt_extent_tree_nodes(xfs_drtbno_t new_startblock,
do_error(
_("couldn't allocate new extent descriptors.\n"));
- record_allocation(&rec->alloc_rec, rt_ba_list);
+ record_allocation(&rec->alloc_rec, &rt_ba_list);
new = &rec->extents[0];
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-19 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 3:38 [PATCH] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 4:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 5:19 ` [PATCH] repair: replaced custom block allocation linked lists with list_heads Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-09-25 14:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-19 14:42 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-09-22 12:02 ` [PATCH V2] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-22 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-22 20:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB4EDBC.9050609@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox