From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: tobias@lists.yoper.com
Subject: [PATCH] fix readahead calculations in xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:49:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABA5192.80509@sandeen.net> (raw)
This is for bug #850,
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=850
XFS file system segfaults , repeatedly and 100% reproducable in 2.6.30 , 2.6.31
The above only showed up on a CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y kernel, because
xfs_bmapi() ASSERTs that it has been asked for at least one map,
and it was getting 0.
The root cause is that our guesstimated "bufsize" from xfs_file_readdir
was fairly small, and the
bufsize -= length;
in the loop was going negative - except bufsize is a size_t, so it
was wrapping to a very large number.
Then when we did
ra_want = howmany(bufsize + mp->m_dirblksize,
mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize) - 1;
with that very large number, the (int) ra_want was coming out
negative, and a subsequent compare:
if (1 + ra_want > map_blocks ...
was coming out -true- (negative int compare w/ uint) and we went
back to xfs_bmapi() for more, even though we did not need more,
and asked for 0 maps, and hit the ASSERT.
We have kind of a type mess here, but just keeping bufsize from
going negative is probably sufficient to avoid the problem.
I'm open to more tidy or obvious solutions though. :)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
---
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
index fa913e4..946562d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
@@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ra_want = howmany(bufsize + mp->m_dirblksize,
mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize) - 1;
+ ASSERT(ra_want >= 0);
/*
* If we don't have as many as we want, and we haven't
@@ -1088,7 +1089,11 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ptr += length;
curoff += length;
- bufsize -= length;
+ /* bufsize may have just been a guess; don't go negative */
+ if (bufsize >= length)
+ bufsize -= length;
+ else
+ bufsize = 0;
}
/*
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 16:49 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH] fix readahead calculations in xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents() Eric Sandeen
2009-09-23 20:29 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-09-25 19:42 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2009-09-26 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-26 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-07 22:22 ` Alex Elder
2009-10-07 22:24 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ABA5192.80509@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tobias@lists.yoper.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox