public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:22:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4FDA8.6060705@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013221946.GB31385@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:06:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> +					agno, agbno,
>>> +				mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);
>> pretty weird indentation here can't you just merge w/ previous line?

I get that...


+_("inode chunk claims used block, inobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb
%d\n"),
+					agno, agbno,
+				mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);

the unindented string is fine but the 3rd line in the paste above
could/should be merged w/ the 2nd.

-Eric


> XFS (especially userspace code) uses this in lots of places.  Gives
> more space to messages but keeps the normal arguments normally aligned.
> 
>> Also is the change from bno to agbno intentional in the message?
>> I guess it's fine.
> 
> That version is more correct.  Don't remember how it got in, though.
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02 17:55 [PATCH 00/14] repair memory usage reductions Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 01/14] repair: merge scanfunc_bno and scanfunc_cnt Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 16:53   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-13 22:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13 23:36       ` Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 02/14] repair: reduce byte swap operations in scanfunc_allocbt Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 17:18   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-13 23:37     ` [PATCH 02/14] repair: reduce byte swap operations inscanfunc_allocbt Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 03/14] repair: kill B_IS_META flag Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 19:45   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-13 22:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13 22:19       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-13 23:38         ` Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 20:06   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-13 22:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13 22:22       ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-10-13 22:23         ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 05/14] repair: reduce byte swapping in scan_freelist Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 20:43   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 06/14] repair: use a btree instead of a radix tree for the prefetch queue Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 17:12   ` [PATCH 06/14] repair: use a btree instead of a radix tree for theprefetch queue Alex Elder
2009-11-12 10:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-12 23:46       ` Dave Chinner
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 07/14] repair: use single prefetch queue Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 17:48   ` Alex Elder
2009-11-12 10:09     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/14] repair: clean up prefetch tracing Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 17:53   ` Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 09/14] repair: track logical to physical block mapping more effeciently Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 19:06   ` [PATCH 09/14] repair: track logical to physical block mapping moreeffeciently Alex Elder
2009-11-12 10:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 10/14] repair: cleanup helpers for tracking block usage Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 19:33   ` Alex Elder
2009-11-12 10:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 11/14] repair: cleanup alloc/free/reset of the block usage tracking Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 20:22   ` [PATCH 11/14] repair: cleanup alloc/free/reset of the block usagetracking Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 12/14] repair: switch block usage bitmap to a btree Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-22 16:22   ` Alex Elder
2009-11-12 10:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 13/14] repair: optimize duplicate extent tracking Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-22 16:41   ` Alex Elder
2009-09-02 17:55 ` [PATCH 14/14] repair: add missing locking in scanfunc_bmap Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-22 16:42   ` Alex Elder
2009-09-03 20:49 ` [PATCH 00/14] repair memory usage reductions Geoffrey Wehrman
2009-09-04  2:57   ` Dave Chinner
2009-09-04 13:37     ` Geoffrey Wehrman
2009-09-04 14:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-04 17:24         ` Michael Monnerie
2009-11-12 15:58 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD4FDA8.6060705@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox