From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9LGS6aV011049 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:28:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4ADF36E3.8080801@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:29:23 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS References: <4ACB3AC5.4010603@vlnb.net> <20091006131020.GA12343@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20091006131020.GA12343@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:40:37PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> After upgrading to 2.6.31 with SCST testings I started seeing the >> following lockdep messages. I have not seen them in 2.6.29. Looks like >> it's something recently introduced. > > The lockdep code to track this has been recently introduced. > > I've sent some patches to fix it ages ago, but so far no one has > bothered to review them. Christoph, remind me again which patch and I'll try to find time now that I'm getting Fedora bug reports. :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs