From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9MGcg3Z114077 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:38:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EEB6C2DA79 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id P0DypntWquFUXwlS for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AE08AED.1020702@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:40:13 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c References: <4ADF2EE8.6010700@sandeen.net> <4ADF4882.70106@sandeen.net> <4AE06BAE.8090706@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Amit Sahrawat Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Amit Sahrawat wrote: > I am already using that patch. > Other than using higher XFS version, can I try any other thing? > > I cannot directly use higher XFS version, I will have to backport the > changes for higher to the kernel I am using because of dependencies. > backporting xfs would be hard; I was hoping that perhaps you could just boot a newer kernel, though I know w/ vendor arm kernels that can be tough. There are drawbacks to not getting machine support upstream... :) I don't really have other things for you to try, and don't have a lot of time to debug 3 year old kernels either... :( You could try your arm testcase in a qemu emulator on a new kernel; if that shows the same problem I'll be much more interested & motivated... -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs