From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9N2ZmlE158591 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:35:48 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3391C2F61A for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id wG7dFzbKE4camK1r for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AE116E1.5050008@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:37:21 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c References: <4ADF2EE8.6010700@sandeen.net> <4ADF4882.70106@sandeen.net> <4AE06BAE.8090706@sandeen.net> <4AE08AED.1020702@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Amit Sahrawat Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Amit Sahrawat wrote: > that means it highely unlikey to get a fix for this issue :( > > Yes, backporting just doest not suits for me. > > I am trying to dig into the code, but really dont know if that's going > to be that easy. > > Thanks Eric for all the help. > W'll you know if I am able to fix this. One other thought on the backporting side; RHEL5.4 now has xfs merged into a 2.6.18-ish kernel. There are still some other supporting bits in that kernel, it's hardly vanilla 2.6.18, but if you want to try a backport route it might be one option. Testing an upstream kernel w/ your testcase in an emulator would also be a reasonable thing to do, I think. -eric > Thanks & Regards, > Amit Sahrawat > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs