From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nAOGN4EH148621 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:23:05 -0600 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 98D4D4C63C7 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EZOt12cQEyVeQdC5 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0C087E.6050701@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:23:26 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Which kernel options should be enabled to find the root cause of this bug? References: <4B0BF866.7040004@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Justin Piszcz wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... >> Do you get the same behavior if you don't add the log options at mount time? > I have not tried disabling the log options, although they have been in effect > for a long time, (the logsbufs and bufsize and recently) the nobarrier > support. Could there be an issue using -o nobarrier on a raid1+xfs? nobarrier should not cause problems. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs