From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nAOJ56X5158700 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:05:06 -0600 Received: from BLADE3.ISTI.CNR.IT (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 34AD012D1ABE for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:05:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLADE3.ISTI.CNR.IT (blade3.isti.cnr.it [194.119.192.19]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id m0rm6B7K35tX5hoG for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:05:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.4 #31773) id <01NGHEFVMM8G9OGIF0@mx.isti.cnr.it> for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:04:27 +0100 Received: from [155.253.41.89] by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.4 #31704) with ESMTPSA id <01NGHEFSNHLA9PM8QJ@mx.isti.cnr.it> for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:04:23 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:04:38 +0100 From: Asdo Subject: Any on-disk format changes recently? Message-id: <4B0C2E46.1040509@shiftmail.org> MIME-version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Dear XFS people I am tracking a nasty bug for which I would need to regress the kernel version from 2.6.31 down to 2.6.28 or maybe even 2.6.24. I have to do this on an important fileserver full of important data on XFS filesystems which were created on 2.6.31. I also need to *write* to the XFS filesystems after regressing the kernel. Do you see any problems with this? Have there been on-disk format changes for XFS since 2.6.24 that could trigger data loss? (or with much minor concern, fail the mount?) Thank you Asdo _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs