From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nAPLZqnW010120 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:35:53 -0600 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8054918E5349 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kYTqZgZTcakKHjXn for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0DA34A.1030400@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:36:10 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 213: Add enospc case to fallocate test References: <4B0D66F7.5080704@redhat.com> <20091125210731.GB12150@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20091125210731.GB12150@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs mailing list Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:18:47AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Add a test for ENOSPC when fallocating. >> >> Also, add an expected output, not sure how that went missing! > > Oops. Easily to do because xfstests doesn't complain but rather just > skips tests without golden output.. > > I guess the ENOSPC test is to catch the inverted error returns just > detected? yep > Anyway, looks good, thanks! -eric > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs