* [PATCH] mkfs: get size of device properly
@ 2010-01-15 22:57 Eric Sandeen
2010-01-17 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2010-01-15 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
Ok, one more.
I've been having too many problems w/ xfstests today to have run
the last patch through xfstests but should have at least run
032. :(
Anyway, last change wasn't valid to test the size of a device
node; total brain fart. After this I'm testing the hell out
of the next patch I send, I promise!
--------
Test device node size properly in check_overwrite, st_size
is only valid for regular files.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
---
diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
index 0743976..689425d 100644
--- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
+++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
@@ -297,18 +297,23 @@ check_overwrite(
const char *type;
blkid_probe pr = NULL;
int ret;
- struct stat statbuf;
+ int fd;
+ long long size;
+ int bsz;
if (!device || !*device)
return 0;
ret = -1; /* will reset on success of all setup calls */
- if (stat(device, &statbuf) < 0)
+ fd = open(device, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0)
goto out;
+ platform_findsizes(device, fd, &size, &bsz);
+ close(fd);
/* nothing to overwrite on a 0-length device */
- if (statbuf.st_size == 0) {
+ if (size == 0) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mkfs: get size of device properly
2010-01-15 22:57 [PATCH] mkfs: get size of device properly Eric Sandeen
@ 2010-01-17 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-17 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-01-17 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Ok, one more.
>
> I've been having too many problems w/ xfstests today to have run
> the last patch through xfstests but should have at least run
> 032. :(
>
> Anyway, last change wasn't valid to test the size of a device
> node; total brain fart. After this I'm testing the hell out
> of the next patch I send, I promise!
>
> --------
>
> Test device node size properly in check_overwrite, st_size
> is only valid for regular files.
The patch looks correct to me, but it also means we now open the device
twice in check_overwrite. We might aswell use it just once and keep the
fd for the blkid probe. Anyway, probably better to put this one in
ASAP, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Any chance you could create a xfstests regression test for this?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-17 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-15 22:57 [PATCH] mkfs: get size of device properly Eric Sandeen
2010-01-17 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-17 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox