From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0UJj3sm233197 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:45:04 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A2C1B188678 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Xu85GkOONBbmxKqZ for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:46:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B648C82.3040801@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:46:10 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 224: test aio hole-fill at 4g References: <4B633F9A.8000404@sandeen.net> <20100130105501.GA22909@infradead.org> <4B645B0D.205@sandeen.net> <20100130172502.GA788@thunk.org> <4B647AFE.5000507@sandeen.net> <20100130191113.GC10181@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100130191113.GC10181@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: ext4 development , tytso@mit.edu, Giel de Nijs , xfs-oss Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:31:26PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> These are the deps that I know xfstests has, to build and to run: >> >> BuildRequires: autoconf, libtool, xfsprogs-devel, e2fsprogs-devel >> BuildRequires: libacl-devel, libattr-devel, libaio-devel >> >> Requires: bash, xfsprogs, xfsdump, perl, acl, attr, bind-utils >> Requires: bc, indent, quota >> >> which isn't so bad... > > Doesn't seem to bad. Indent is afaik only needed for the weird 122 test > which doesn't apply to non-xfs filesystems. and FWIW, we do: _require_command /usr/bin/indent so it'll just not run if it's not there (the above was for an rpm attempt I made, wishing to automatically pull in everything that might possibly be needed.) -Eric >> I'm not sure an xfsprogs dependency is so onerous; plenty has depended >> on e2fsprogs through the years and we've lived with that ;) But >> the lag time for xfsprogs to use released xfs_io functionality is a >> bit of a bummer. >> >> But I guess I don't have a great answer for who else uses xfs_io: > > I use xfs_io in lots various local scripts. It's a really handly > tool for exercising some of the more weird I/O related syscalls. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs