From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o14GqFIO076425 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:52:16 -0600 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8AF491AF3FA for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id SjwTRvTSRXe0K8t8 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o14GrOfx013591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:53:24 -0500 Received: from neon.msp.redhat.com (neon.msp.redhat.com [10.15.80.10]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o14GrNue020255 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:53:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4B6AFB83.1070309@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:53:23 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: xfsprogs: to -DDEBUG or not to -DDEBUG? List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs mailing list Fedora, long ago, disabled debug in the xfsprogs specfile: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/F-12/xfsprogs/xfsprogs.spec?r1=1.5&r2=1.6 * Wed Apr 20 2005 Dave Jones - Disable debug. (#151438) per this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151438 referencing this email thread: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2005-03/msg00038.html which no longer exists (grrrr) but is probably now here: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00416.html Fedora still builds with -DNDEBUG, but the upstream tarball has it on by default. I have seen several occasions where other distros had failing xfs_repairs which were "fixed" by disabling debug. I'd like to make a decision on whether DEBUG should be on or off by default for upstream releases. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs