From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>, xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs.xfs fix detection of empty devices
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:15:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6B2AC5.1070803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100204194000.GA7229@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We currently fail to detect that a device does indeed not contain any
> signature and we are indeed fine to proceed with it due to mishandling
> the return value of blkid_do_fullprobe. Fix that up and add some
> better diagnostics of the blkid detection. Also remove the size == 0
> check in check_overwrite as blkid handles that just fine.
Much better, thanks, minor comment below
> from RH bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561870
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=k bs=1MB count=2 seek=20; mkfs.xfs k
> # mkfs.xfs: probe of k failed, cannot detect existing filesystem.
> # mkfs.xfs: Use the -f option to force overwrite
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Index: xfsprogs-dev/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfsprogs-dev.orig/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c 2010-02-04 19:19:36.000000000 +0000
> +++ xfsprogs-dev/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c 2010-02-04 19:33:36.000000000 +0000
> @@ -297,48 +297,47 @@ check_overwrite(
> const char *type;
> blkid_probe pr = NULL;
> int ret;
> - int fd;
> - long long size;
> - int bsz;
>
> if (!device || !*device)
> return 0;
>
> ret = -1; /* will reset on success of all setup calls */
>
> - fd = open(device, O_RDONLY);
> - if (fd < 0)
> - goto out;
> - platform_findsizes(device, fd, &size, &bsz);
> - close(fd);
> -
> - /* nothing to overwrite on a 0-length device */
> - if (size == 0) {
> - ret = 0;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> pr = blkid_new_probe_from_filename(device);
> if (!pr)
> goto out;
>
> - if (blkid_probe_enable_partitions(pr, 1))
> + ret = blkid_probe_enable_partitions(pr, 1);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = blkid_do_fullprobe(pr);
> + if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
>
> - if (blkid_do_fullprobe(pr))
> + /*
> + * Blkid returns 1 for nothing found and 0 when it finds a signature,
> + * but we want the exact opposite, so reverse the return value here.
> + *
> + * In addition print some useful diagnostics about what actually is
> + * on the device.
> + */
> + ret = !ret;
> + if (!ret)
> goto out;
that makes my brain hurt a little. Maybe:
if (ret == 1) { /* blkid found nothing */
ret = 0; /* we return 0 for nothing found */
goto out;
} else /* blkid found something */
ret = 1; /* we return 1 for something found */
it's wordy but at least not confusing.
I'm ok either way, I guess, so:
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
unless you change anything enough that you want another review. :)
-Eric
> - ret = 0;
> if (!blkid_probe_lookup_value(pr, "TYPE", &type, NULL)) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> _("%s: %s appears to contain an existing "
> "filesystem (%s).\n"), progname, device, type);
> - ret = 1;
> } else if (!blkid_probe_lookup_value(pr, "PTTYPE", &type, NULL)) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> _("%s: %s appears to contain a partition "
> "table (%s).\n"), progname, device, type);
> - ret = 1;
> + } else {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + _("%s: %s appears to contain something weird "
> + "according to blkid\n"), progname, device);
> }
>
> out:
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 16:34 [PATCH] mkfs: don't try to detect filesystems on regular files via blkid Eric Sandeen
2010-02-04 16:46 ` Jim Meyering
2010-02-04 16:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-04 17:48 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2010-02-04 19:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-04 19:40 ` [PATCH] mkfs.xfs fix detection of empty devices Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-02-04 22:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-05 3:41 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6B2AC5.1070803@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=meyering@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox