From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:16:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6FE47A.7070208@news-service.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6706CE.1020207@news-service.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2297 bytes --]
We had another crash on the same server last weekend. Looks the same to me.
Thanks for looking into this.
-Patrick
On 1-2-2010 17:52, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> I'm afraid we had another crash a few days ago. Have a look at the
> screenshot. Can you make anything out of it? This server is running
> 2.6.32.3 with your inode-reclaim patch applied and XFS_DEBUG still enabled.
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 15-1-2010 12:01, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I think it's save to consider this issue fixed. We have currently 9
>> servers operational with these patches and they have been stable so far.
>> For a 100% certainty we'll have to test/wait a little bit longer, but
>> considering the frequency of crashes we saw earlier i think it's save to
>> come to a conclusion.
>>
>> I hope these patches will be included in 2.6.33 and will be back ported
>> to at least 2.6.32.
>>
>> Many thanks to Dave and to Christoph for fixing this apparently rare and
>> seldom triggered condition.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> I've attached two compendium patches that will hopefully fix
>>> the inode reclaim problems you've been seeing - one is for 2.6.31,
>>> the other is for 2.6.32. I've cc'd this to the XFS list ѕo that
>>> anyone else who has been seeing crashes, assert failures and
>>> general nastiness around inode reclaim can test them as well.
>>>
>>> These are not final patches - there's a few changes that Christoph
>>> has picked up on during review - so there'll be another round of
>>> patches before checkins and -stable backports can be requested.
>>>
>>> I'm hoping that these patches fix your problem, because with them
>>> I can't make my machines fall over anymore....
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 10:27 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-09-17 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-29 10:15 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-29 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-30 10:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-30 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-02 14:24 ` Bas Couwenberg
2009-10-05 21:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-07 1:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-08 8:45 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 7:43 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 23:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15 15:06 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-18 23:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-20 3:40 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-21 9:45 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-22 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-27 10:41 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
[not found] ` <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 14:46 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-11-14 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <4B0A8075.8080008@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20091211115932.GA20632@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster>
[not found] ` <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com>
2010-01-08 11:31 ` [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) Dave Chinner
2010-01-11 20:22 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-01-15 11:01 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-01 16:52 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 10:16 ` Patrick Schreurs [this message]
2010-02-08 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-09 8:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-09 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 12:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 15:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-24 18:30 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-25 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-01 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6FE47A.7070208@news-service.com \
--to=patrick@news-service.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox