From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:42:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B72A9D1.8030101@news-service.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100209103157.GA5197@infradead.org>
On 9-2-2010 11:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:48:38AM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>> This is a clean 2.6.32.3 with the xfs-inode-reclaim-2.6.32 patch i
>> received from Dave on January 8th (see attachment).
>
> I can't find anything interesting regarding I_RECLAIMABLE manipulation
> in there. The only thing I could think off going wrong is i_flags
> and i_update_core sitting in the same word and the compiler causing
> some read-modify-write cycles for it. Can you test the patch below?
> It fixes the abose issue up, and to make sure sure the assert you hit
> isn't as lethal changes it into a WARN_ON, which will still print the
> backtrace, but not crash the machine.
Thanks for the patch. After having this patch applied we saw *a lot*
warnings. They all look like this:
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: WARNING: at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:768
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x3d/0x84()
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Hardware name: PowerEdge 1950
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Modules linked in: acpi_cpufreq
cpufreq_ondemand ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler bonding mptspi
serio_raw rng_core scsi_transport_spi bnx2 thermal processor thermal_sys
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Pid: 3145, comm: xfssyncd Not tainted
2.6.32.3 #2
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a897>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x3d/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a897>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x3d/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8102e8c9>] ?
warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa3
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a897>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x3d/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b130>] ?
xfs_inode_ag_walk+0x68/0xa2
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a85a>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b1ba>] ?
xfs_inode_ag_iterator+0x50/0x7e
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a85a>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b224>] ?
xfs_sync_worker+0x26/0x52
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113aa79>] ? xfssyncd+0x123/0x180
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a956>] ? xfssyncd+0x0/0x180
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8103f5cd>] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bcda>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8103f554>] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bcd0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: ---[ end trace 1ae862ca12666a87 ]---
and some look like this:
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: WARNING: at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:768
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x3d/0x84()
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Hardware name: PowerEdge 1950
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: Modules linked in: acpi_cpufreq
cpufreq_ondemand ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandlerspes 13<f3dat?
ff4ode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b1ba>]n2r4a
2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat? ff4ode_n]n2r4a
2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat? xff4ode_n]n2r4a
2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat? xff4ode_n]n2r4a
2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospies 13<f3dat? ff4ode]n2r4a
2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat? xff4ode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffff]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e
:7we_ospes 13<ode_]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
ff4ode_now+0x0/0]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
ff4ode_now+0x0/0x]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
ff4ode_no]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat? ff4ode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<fff]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes
13<f3dat? ff4ode_now+]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
ff4>ode_no]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
xff4ode_now+]n2r4a 2f1>nx85k7[<4x0-[e :7we_ospes 13<f3dat?
xff4ode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b1ba>] ?
xfs_inode_ag_iterator+0x50/0x7e
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a85a>] ?
xfs_reclaim_inode_now+0x0/0x84
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113b224>] ?
xfs_sync_worker+0x26/0x52
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113aa79>] ? xfssyncd+0x123/0x180
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8113a956>] ? xfssyncd+0x0/0x180
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8103f5cd>] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bcda>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8103f554>] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bcd0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Feb 10 13:20:38 sb06 kernel: ---[ end trace 1ae862ca12666b1c ]---
I hope this clarifies things. If you need more info, don't hesitate to
contact me.
Thanks,
-Patrick
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 10:27 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-09-17 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-29 10:15 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-29 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-30 10:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-30 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-02 14:24 ` Bas Couwenberg
2009-10-05 21:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-07 1:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-08 8:45 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 7:43 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 23:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15 15:06 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-18 23:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-20 3:40 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-21 9:45 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-22 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-27 10:41 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
[not found] ` <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 14:46 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-11-14 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <4B0A8075.8080008@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20091211115932.GA20632@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster>
[not found] ` <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com>
2010-01-08 11:31 ` [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) Dave Chinner
2010-01-11 20:22 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-01-15 11:01 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-01 16:52 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 10:16 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-09 8:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-09 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 12:42 ` Patrick Schreurs [this message]
2010-02-10 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 15:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-24 18:30 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-25 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-01 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B72A9D1.8030101@news-service.com \
--to=patrick@news-service.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox