From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1AKE9eu076507 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:14:09 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 238D81396BB6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VGFhwAzeGfOri3aC for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B7313D9.9020603@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:15:21 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable inode64 by default when possible References: <4B7309D7.5090800@sandeen.net> <20100210210448.36f16aba@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20100210210448.36f16aba@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:32:39 -0600 vous =E9criviez: > = >> As such, this patch changes the default to inode64 whenever >> XFS_BIG_INUMS is set, which in turn depends on either >> CONFIG_LBDAF or 64-bit longs. > = > But doesn't it cause problems specially for NFS sharing ? > = For some clients, yes - as do other NFS servers. That's what noinode64 is for... Also, newer nfs clients have an option: nfs.enable_ino64=3D [NFS] enable 64-bit inode numbers. If zero, the NFS client will fake up a 32-bit inode number for the readdir() and stat() syscalls instead of returning the full 64-bit number. The default is to return 64-bit inode numbers. (see Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt) At some point we have to drag people kicking and screaming out of 1988, I think! :) (I am mindful that this may manifest itself as "xfs is incompatible" but if we document this and advertise it a bit, I hope we can avoid that. At some point, apps just need to be fixed.) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs