From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1CKRqoL023799 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:27:52 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8F23D1CC8D99 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jbprLY68M8XfGqeV for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:29:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B75BA12.1060704@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:29:06 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_repair doesn't fix sb versionnum missing attr References: <1265996674.7755.7.camel@lh10.linush.net> In-Reply-To: <1265996674.7755.7.camel@lh10.linush.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: C Linus Hicks Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com C Linus Hicks wrote: > I run: > > xfs_check /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports: > > sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 > > Then I run: > > xfs_repair /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports output from 7 phases and "done". > > Again I run: > > xfs_check /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports: > > sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 > > Is this how it's supposed to work? > Thanks for any help. > Linus > I've never seen that before. This might be interesting to see: # xfs_db /dev/sdc10 xfs_db> sb 0 xfs_db> version If you want to send me a zipped-up, obfuscated metadump of the filesystem I could take a quick look. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs