From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1OISsgw040527 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:28:55 -0600 Received: from pu01.news-service.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5EFA71DBAD5F for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pu01.news-service.com (ns1.news-service.com [195.114.240.3]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Wc0ijnKDH4BPy1VK for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:30:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B85703A.60104@news-service.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:30:18 +0100 From: Patrick Schreurs MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) References: <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com> <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster> <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com> <20100108113114.GA8654@discord.disaster> <4B504B03.7050604@news-service.com> <4B6706CE.1020207@news-service.com> <20100208194226.GD9527@infradead.org> <4B712166.9010701@news-service.com> <20100209103157.GA5197@infradead.org> <4B72A9D1.8030101@news-service.com> <20100210145508.GA29047@infradead.org> <4B72D3F3.2040308@news-service.com> In-Reply-To: <4B72D3F3.2040308@news-service.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tommy van Leeuwen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 10-2-2010 16:42, Patrick Schreurs wrote: > On 10-2-2010 15:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:42:57PM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote: >>> Thanks for the patch. After having this patch applied we saw *a lot* >>> warnings. They all look like this: >> >> Ok, looks like that is not an issue, so you can discard that patch. >> >> I went down to the radix tree code to look for races in it's tag >> handling, but then noticed that we might have an issue with our >> usage of the radix-tree API. Can you try the patch below ontop >> of Dave's rollup, and instead of my previous one? > > Okay. This patch is currently active. Thanks. I don't have a way to > trigger it, so we'll have to wait and see what happens. Servers running with this patch applied are still running stable. The first server we've patched is running stable for 2 weeks now. Should we try to have this patches included for 2.6.33? -Patrick _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs