From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o232752R031976 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:07:05 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 88AA51D09AC2 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FDMNO9K8df1pQvJJ for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:08:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B8DC49F.70103@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:08:31 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem References: <4B8DAECA.50701@hardwarefreak.com> <4B8DB0ED.5040109@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jason Vagalatos Cc: Stan Hoeppner , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Jason Vagalatos wrote: > We are running xfs_repair v2.9.4. Will just the -P flag suffice for > this version? What is the best way to calculate the bhash size value > needed if we need to use that option too? Good, that explains it then; the fix went in after that. I think -P will suffice. As for the bhash size ... really not sure. Doubling it from the default is probably sufficient but I haven't really investigated it. -Eric > Thanks, > > Jason Vagalatos > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs