From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o2UMQqoj212264 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:26:54 -0500 Received: from mail.andcycle.idv.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A4D9128ECF9 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.andcycle.idv.tw (andcycle.idv.tw [122.116.40.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VBTxzCLKEQd9GGWk for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB27AFE.2030205@andcycle.idv.tw> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:28:14 +0800 From: AndCycle MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: xfs_fsr defrag top 10% that have the largest number of extents?? List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com my xfs_fsr version is xfsdump_2.2.48-1, there is a description in xfs_fsr man said " When invoked with no arguments xfs_fsr reorganizes all regular files in all mounted filesystems. (...) Each pass goes through and selects files that have the largest number of extents. It attempts to defragment the top 10% of these files on each pass. " but xfs_fsr -d telling me it defrags in inode ascending order, http://pastebin.com/h0RyZkwA is this a normal behavior? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs