From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3N3HhCK008911 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:17:44 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8A45110591D6 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LkCNasJP0Lu3NAvf for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BD111CA.4040205@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:19:38 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: is realtime device supported? References: <20100422144939.GA3822@laptop.oracle.com> <20100422162325.GA29668@infradead.org> <4BD07F06.70101@sandeen.net> <20100423030011.GB2949@laptop.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20100423030011.GB2949@laptop.oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wengang Wang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , greg.marsden@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Wengang Wang wrote: > On 10-04-22 11:53, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:49:39PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: >>>> Do we support realtime device? >>>> >>>> I got the following error: >>> It sounds like you do not have CONFIG_XFS_RT enable in your kernel >>> configuration. But to answer your original question the realtime >>> device is not supported in the sense of actively maintained. The >>> code is still there, but more or less for legacy reasons. I would >>> not recommend it for new installations. > > Yes, CONFIG_XFS_RT is disabled. > [wwg@desk linux-2.6.18.x86_64]$ grep CONFIG_XFS_RT .config > # CONFIG_XFS_RT is not set > > And Ok I see. Also should we add the point to man page of mkfs.xfs? > >> Agreed. >> >> FWIW, dmesg probably gave you a more helpful error message than >> mount... >> >> cmn_err(CE_WARN, "XFS: RT mount failed"); >> >> hm or maybe not ;) > > Only "XFS: RT mount failed" :) A patch to explicitly say that it failed because CONFIG_XFS_RT was off would be happily accepted, too. I am curious, are you doing a lot of QA type work on xfs? You are finding some interesting things that could certainly be fixed up, we appreciate it. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs