From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3O4opWS119051 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:50:52 -0500 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 90A381303719 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uDXjUqyKQ92rTpvI for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200C36C243 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:52:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4BD27923.1020208@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:52:51 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3] References: <4BD25B7F.8020509@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD25B7F.8020509@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen put forth on 4/23/2010 9:46 PM: > FYI... > > I asked Keith if he could do xfs nobarrier runs as well. > > If there are ext4 nobarrier runs "winning" it seems only fair. :) Do you have a link to the hardware specs used in the testing Eric? Thanks. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs