From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3OEUw82158143 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:30:58 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 086888C8159 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-60-146.usfamily.net [64.131.60.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sPx49SY2afhF6BDL for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BD30119.3020404@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:32:57 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3] References: <4BD25B7F.8020509@redhat.com> <4BD27923.1020208@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD27923.1020208@hardwarefreak.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stan Hoeppner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Eric Sandeen put forth on 4/23/2010 9:46 PM: >> FYI... >> >> I asked Keith if he could do xfs nobarrier runs as well. >> >> If there are ext4 nobarrier runs "winning" it seems only fair. :) > > Do you have a link to the hardware specs used in the testing Eric? > > Thanks. > There are machine specs at http://btrfs.boxacle.net/ but I don't know for -sure- that he's testing the exact same setup now. I assume so, though. (I shoulda included that top URL in the message) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs