From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: willis@arlut.utexas.edu
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:54:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD5FD72.2070106@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26132521.11272313223159.JavaMail.root@wombat>
On 04/26/2010 03:20 PM, willis@arlut.utexas.edu wrote:
> Federico Sevilla III wrote: "It wasn't an XFS-centric problem, after
> all"
>
> Adding Federico's comment... Some Adadptec Controller firmware
> versions will pass incorrect device parameters to the linux kernel.
> The kernel log output misled me to believe is was a corrupt
> filesystem or partition map, however it was just an adaptec bug.
>
> Adaptac has a fix procedure for this at:
> http://ask.adaptec.com/scripts/adaptec_tic.cfg/php.exe/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=16914
Thanks for the followup; we've seen this a couple times, and it
has always stumped me.
-Eric
> Below is the my kernel's dmesg output. After following Adaptec's
> procedure, the errors went away and I was able to mount the
> filesystem and see all of my existing data. ----- mount: /dev/sda:
> can't read superblock Mount Error at /dev/sdj. Is filesystem
> realtime? Need a File System? attempt to access beyond end of device
> sda: rw=0, want=YYYY, limit=XXXX I/O error in filesystem ("sda")
> meta-data dev sdj block 0xZZZZ ("xfs_read_buf") error 5 buf count
> 512 XFS: size check 2 failed -----
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Willis
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Eric Sandeen wrote : Federico Sevilla III wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've set up Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 "Etch" on an IBM x3400 machine
>> with two 73.4GB SAS hard drives in hardware RAID 1 with a
>> battery-backed cache. We are using the stock Debian 2.6.18-4-686
>> kernel.
>
> can you send along the results of:
>
> # xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "print" /dev/sda8?
>
> and # cat /proc/partitions
>
> ... and does the hardware raid have a funky sector size?
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
> -- This message was sent on behalf of willis@arlut.utexas.edu at
> openSubscriber.com
> http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com/7550412.html
>
> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 13:59 Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device Federico Sevilla III
2007-09-10 14:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-09-10 14:59 ` Federico Sevilla III
2007-09-10 15:45 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-09-10 15:51 ` Federico Sevilla III
2007-09-10 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-09-10 15:54 ` Federico Sevilla III
2007-09-10 16:28 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <cc7060690709111208u3e0842f9rd6edff16539b8a28@mail.gmail.com>
2007-09-12 5:17 ` Federico Sevilla III
2010-04-26 20:20 ` willis
2010-04-26 20:54 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD5FD72.2070106@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=willis@arlut.utexas.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox