From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3T81cvR052372 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:01:39 -0500 Received: from hermes.mejor.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D79EC2FD30E for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.mejor.pl (hermes.mejor.pl [193.238.12.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CVgH03Y2wNjioTtp for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127-goc-33.acn.waw.pl ([94.75.108.127] helo=[192.168.138.2]) by hermes.mejor.pl with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O7Oik-00064h-B2 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:03:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4BD93D59.2010506@mejor.pl> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:03:37 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2luIE1pcm9zxYJhdw==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem References: <4BD84771.4030804@mejor.pl> <20100428230447.GJ9783@dastard> <20100429014312.GA2512@dastard> <4BD8E622.80100@sandeen.net> <20100429020549.GC2512@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20100429020549.GC2512@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com W dniu 29.04.2010 04:05, Dave Chinner pisze: > Yeah, you are right. I was thinking that xfs_db did the feature bit > modifications, then repair just fixed up the accounting. but repair > does both in this case. I should remember code that I wrote years > ago, but for some reason it all seems to be a little bit hazy... > > Let me go look at your repair patch again ;) Hi, Eric, Dave, thank you for quick replay and patch. Patch solves problem for me:) Regards! Marcin _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs