public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pol <polmail@gmail.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Please Help
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 13:36:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE3FB32.8030709@gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1613 bytes --]

Good morning.
I'm writing from Barcelona and English is not my born language, so I'd 
like to apologize in advance for any possible mistakes in my text.

I'm a Windows user who has recently moved to Linux (Ubuntu 10.04), and I 
have a serious problem regarding my Hard Drives' File System.
I have a desktop version of Ubuntu and I'm a complete regular user.

I have two physical drives in my system:
1. 36GB: EXT4 partition for /, another EXT4 for /home and a SWAP one.
2. 1TB (for data) drive.

I generate so much video and music data per month (AVI, MKV, MP3, WAV) 
because of my job, and need to copy it to external hard drives to ensure 
I don't lose any of it.

My question is about the FS to use in these data drives.
I currently have all of them in XFS fyle system. Every file I generate 
is saved in my internal XFS drive, and whenever the hd is almost full I 
copy the important files to External Hard Drives which are also 
formatted as XFS.

My problem comes after reading a couple of posts from 2006 in some 
forums on the web. They said that XFS is very unsecure when a power 
failure happens and recommended EXT3 (EXT4 these days I guess). They 
said that after a power failure it's very common to see data loss 
(something that never happened to me in all my years using NTFS).

As far as I know XFS is much more secure than NTFS so I don't really 
understand this issue. I assume these people were talking about systems 
which need to be continously writing to the disk, but my knowledge about 
this is very limited.

Did I chose the correct FS for my drives?


Thank you very much for your time.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1931 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2010-05-07 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-07 11:36 Pol [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-10  5:56 please help cyjoyp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE3FB32.8030709@gmail.com \
    --to=polmail@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox