From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o4MM8JTG087321 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:08:19 -0500 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BE0E8142DADD for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PGChH3SiQC5dxYRT for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8946C2B1 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:10:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4BF8571A.8020605@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 17:13:46 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Tuning XFS for real time audio on a laptop with encrypted LVM References: <20100521041415.GW8120@dastard> <4BF62766.8070105@hardwarefreak.com> <4BF68E74.8040305@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Pedro Ribeiro put forth on 5/22/2010 7:21 AM: > Hi, > results are attached. There appears to be no difference between any of > the schedulers. That's a bit more... thorough than what we need, and makes digesting it and making comparisons difficult. Can you make just 4 runs, one with each elevator, on /dev/sda with 64 threads and post results? I saw some outrageously high numbers in your data due to caching of that tiny 337MB /dev/sda partition. Also, can you show confirmation of the elevator change between each run? Thanks. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs