public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@tlinx.org>
To: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@dermichi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though	xfs_repair	thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:42:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2A92DA.1020202@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2A87FF.7090804@dermichi.com>



Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
> Hi!
>>> 2359101 ?????????? ? ? ? ?                ? 30-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Reinaʼs Ver.).mp3
>>> 2354946 ?????????? ? ? ? ?                ? 31-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Tomoeʼs Ver.).mp3
>>> 2354949 ?????????? ? ? ? ?                ? 32-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Nanualʼs Ver.).mp3
>>> ls: cannot access bad2/30-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Reinaʼs Ver.).mp3: No such file or directory
>>> ls: cannot access bad2/31-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Tomoeʼs Ver.).mp3: No such file or directory
>>> ls: cannot access bad2/32-Omoide to Yakusoku (TV saizu｜Nanualʼs Ver.).mp3: No such file or directory
>> ...
>>
>> If there are no problems reported by repair, then I suspect that
>> it's a terminal level problem...
>>
> Looking at this i remember having similar problems when my filesystems
> was mounted with inode64 before and after i left out that parameter. So
> Linda, could you re-try mounting the fs with "inode64".
----
	I ran into that before as well -- already tried

Notice the listing you see is the output of "ls -in".
Those numbers are the inodes.  ...HEY, wait.
When do you need 64-bit inodes?  The dump size said it was:
xfsdump: estimated dump size: 2360915740992 bytes

It's getting right near to overflowing a 32-bit integer.

Do I need >32 bit inodes if the filesystem size is > 2T?

I'm guessing the file system just recently passed the 2G mark.
Note -- I DID try the inode64 mount option -- it made no difference.


But if you need 64-bit inodes for file systems > 2T file systems,
then shouldn't I have gotten some error rather than it eating files
for lunch?

The inode numbers themselves, are not even close to being over 32bits.  

Sigh...


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-30  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-27  1:10 WARNING xfsdump [still] Cannot allocate memory for list of [root|non-root] attributes for nondir ino xxyz Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-28  2:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-29 22:33   ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) Linda Walsh
2010-06-29 23:25     ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ " Dave Chinner
2010-06-29 23:55       ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-06-30  0:42         ` Linda A. Walsh [this message]
2010-06-30  1:16           ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ " Dave Chinner
2010-06-30  2:45             ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-01 23:58               ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-07  3:18                 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07  5:56                   ` Linda Walsh
2010-07-07  6:36                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-07  9:30                       ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07 21:01                         ` Linda Walsh
2010-06-30  0:01       ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30  1:06         ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ " Dave Chinner
2010-06-30  1:52           ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ " Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 21:01             ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-07 21:40               ` utf-8' chars from Winxp machine may be problem related (was Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair...) Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07 23:40                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-08  0:38                   ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 18:25     ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) Michael Monnerie
2010-06-30 23:30       ` rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem) Dave Chinner
2010-07-01  8:25         ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-02  2:42           ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-02  6:21             ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-04 22:53               ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 11:28                 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-07 21:56         ` Linda Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C2A92DA.1020202@tlinx.org \
    --to=xfs@tlinx.org \
    --cc=mw@dermichi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox