From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o5UGISSk135722 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:18:28 -0500 Received: from Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 997E841BC02 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [173.164.175.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FKpx2AFxUOisv7wc for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.12] (Athenae [192.168.3.12]) by Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o5UGL23k018089 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:21:04 -0700 Message-ID: <4C2B6EEE.5050103@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:21:02 -0700 From: "Linda A. Walsh" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: xfs_restore -R -- recovering a previous restore...does it work? References: <4C2B37D6.50801@tlinx.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2B37D6.50801@tlinx.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss So why is this crashing? I just had it happen again -- something killed off the window it was executing in -- system didn't go down, but it got a hangup -- a cleaner shutdown -- but it still doesn't recover. Under what circumstances should this work? Or does it work? Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Due to another bug in lvm, my restore of this partition crashed after running a few > hours (takes alot longer to restore than to backup). > > So I decided to use the "-R" option to Resume my previously left off dump: > > # xfsrestore -R -p 180 -f /backups/Ishtar/torrents/torrents-100629-0-1611.dump . > xfsrestore: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy > xfsrestore: version 3.0.4 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-threaded > xfsrestore: resuming restore previously begun Wed Jun 30 04:41:57 2010 > xfsrestore: examining media file 0 > xfsrestore: seeking past portion of media file already restored > > Looks good so far!..Yup, and.. > > xfsrestore: drive_simple.c:770: do_seek_mark: Assertion `nreadneeded64 <= ( ( intgen_t ) ( ( ( 1ull << ( ( unsigned long long )sizeof( intgen_t ) * ( unsigned long long )8 - ( 1ull + 1ull ))) - 1ull ) * 2ull + 1ull ))' failed. > Aborted (core dumped) > > > Say what? Um...is that supposed to be an error message? > > Why can't it just tell me why "'nreadneeded64' > 0xbfffffffffffffd" > is 'bad', or what it means? > > I have a feeling that the 'core dumped' message means that > if I want my filesystem restored in the near future, I should > just restart... > > *sigh* > -l > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs