From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o66GF8uE191885 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:15:09 -0500 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AE47142CF83 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rl9QXcZPSIk0ZEFM for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A7B6C3F1 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:17:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4C335736.1070701@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:17:58 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: CentOS 5.5 XFS internal errors (XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO) References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Shaun Adolphson put forth on 7/6/2010 5:57 AM: > Software: > - Fresh install of CentOS 5.5 64bit all patches up to date > - Kernel 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.centos.plus First thing that comes to mind is the fact that 2.6.18 is about 3 years old. I'm not familiar with CentOS patching policies, but even if you've received and applied some XFS patches, they'd still probably be rather old. If CentOS 5.5 doesn't have a much newer kernel package available, say 2.6.30 or later, if I were you, I'd grab the kernel source from kernel.org and roll your own 2.6.33.6 or 2.6.34.1. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs