From: Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:30:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C688691.2020100@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008141328.18436.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Cc'd Steve as I think he is running the benchmarks.
>
> Am Freitag 13 August 2010 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
>
>> Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:29:07AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>>> And asking
>>>> him/her to add -o delaylog would also be good.
>>>>
>>> Yes, that would be an interesting comparison...
>>>
>> I was thinking the same thing; I'll do that.
>>
>
> I think its Steven Pratt from IBM.
>
> Steve, could you add a case for mount option "-o delaylog" to your
> benchmark runs?
>
Which filesystem is this for? Keith has been helping me with some of
these runs. We'll see if we can add this.
Steve
> ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
>
> Subject: New performance results
> Date: Samstag 24 April 2010
> From: Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>
> To: "linux-btrfs" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
>
> Well, it's been a while but been very busy on other things. Thanks to
> Keith Mannthey for helping get some of these runs done.
>
> New raid performance on 2.6.34-rc3:
>
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2010-04-14_2004/2.6.34-
> rc3/2.6.34-rc3.html
>
> Also, the long running history graphs are here:
>
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> --
> [...]
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ciao,
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 10:46 observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in Khelben Blackstaff
2010-08-12 19:05 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-08-12 21:46 ` Peter Niemayer
2010-08-13 9:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-08-13 10:35 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-08-13 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-13 14:13 ` Dave Chinner
2010-08-13 20:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-14 11:28 ` Martin Steigerwald
2010-08-16 0:30 ` Steven Pratt [this message]
2010-08-16 1:03 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C688691.2020100@austin.ibm.com \
--to=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox