From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7G0TtCj208381 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:29:55 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 34CA0170E91C for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 49PvjgMZqyEMEekO for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7G0M6cT019547 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:22:06 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o7G0UFAW206828 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:30:16 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o7G0UDhZ014023 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:30:15 -0600 Message-ID: <4C688691.2020100@austin.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:30:09 -0500 From: Steven Pratt MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in References: <201008121346.30760.eye.of.the.8eholder@gmail.com> <20100813141344.GE10429@dastard> <4C65AE4D.6070502@sandeen.net> (sfid-20100814_092305_493513_AC7C6900) <201008141328.18436.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <201008141328.18436.Martin@lichtvoll.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: Michael Monnerie , Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Mannthey , Stan Hoeppner Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > Cc'd Steve as I think he is running the benchmarks. > > Am Freitag 13 August 2010 schrieb Eric Sandeen: > >> Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:29:07AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> >> ... >> >> >>>> And asking >>>> him/her to add -o delaylog would also be good. >>>> >>> Yes, that would be an interesting comparison... >>> >> I was thinking the same thing; I'll do that. >> > > I think its Steven Pratt from IBM. > > Steve, could you add a case for mount option "-o delaylog" to your > benchmark runs? > Which filesystem is this for? Keith has been helping me with some of these runs. We'll see if we can add this. Steve > ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- > > Subject: New performance results > Date: Samstag 24 April 2010 > From: Steven Pratt > To: "linux-btrfs" > > Well, it's been a while but been very busy on other things. Thanks to > Keith Mannthey for helping get some of these runs done. > > New raid performance on 2.6.34-rc3: > > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2010-04-14_2004/2.6.34- > rc3/2.6.34-rc3.html > > Also, the long running history graphs are here: > > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html > > > Steve > > > -- > [...] > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Ciao, > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs