From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7VCu84G062221 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:56:08 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 550093CDA2 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7Qtg1X7QKVjadArV for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7CFC08.1000708@profihost.ag> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:40 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS Quota Check OOM References: <4C7BA0A0.5090202@profihost.ag> <4C7CB0FE.1020302@profihost.ag> <20100831104418.058ab6b5@galadriel.home> <4C7CF4C4.9030105@profihost.ag> <20100831144319.7e97acea@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20100831144319.7e97acea@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Oh we don't do this today. But it is a really old system where someone = someday decided to do that. Sadly i can't change this... Stefan Am 31.08.2010 14:43, schrieb Emmanuel Florac: > Le Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:25:40 +0200 vous =E9criviez: > >> Disk Size: >> /dev/sda3 4.8T 2.7T 2.2T 55% / > > This is really very very weird. Why on earth would you use such a big > root filesystem? It is extremely impractical and dangerous to store > data on the root filesystem. Do you have any good reason not to have a > small root filesystem and a distinct data one? > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs