From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Marcus Osdoba <marcus.osdoba@googlemail.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs on armv5 still with erroneous log in kernel 2.6.35.4
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:24:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C845EDE.3010806@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906005230.GX7362@dastard>
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:52:04AM +0200, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
>> Hello XFS mailinglist,
>>
>> On my armv5 device I like to use XFS for my simple home made nas,
>> because I think it is ideal for low/medium performance CPUs.
>> I searched the mailing archive about the usage of XFS on arm
>> architecture. I figured out, that the patchset of James Bottomley
>> was applied to the main line. So I expected xfs to run properly on
>> arm. Unfortunatly I still run into this (known) error after writing
>> some data on an xfs partition and remounting it:
>> <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>"
>> SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block/inode numbers,
>> no debug enabled
>> SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
>> XFS mounting filesystem sda1
>> Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sda1 (logdev: internal)
>> XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid
>> XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5
>> XFS: log mount failed
>> "
>>
>> Am I still forced to use the "hammer" approach (flushing buffers in
>> xfs_buf.c) which was proposed in January 2010? Or did I misinterpret
>> the logfile of the xfs component in the kernel (so no arm fixing
>> patches were applied)?
>
> What kernel version are you running? The xfs-vipt branch was merged into
> mainline in late February, so kernels from 2.6.34 onwards should be
> OK.
>
> If it isn't ok, then we need to know exactly what ARM CPU arch you
> are using, and if the old brute-force cache flushing hack fix the
> problem or not.
>
>> Is xfs NOW be known to work on arm (e.g. armv5)? If so I like to
>> complain. If not, I'm willing to test patches which might solve this
>> issue.
>
> I don't know of any outstanding XFS specific issues on ARM, but I
> don't have any ARM machines here that I can test on....
I do, and owe their donors some testing; if this is still failing
on a kernel with the vipt stuff in place I'll haul them out and
do some testing..
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-05 8:52 xfs on armv5 still with erroneous log in kernel 2.6.35.4 Marcus Osdoba
2010-09-06 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06 3:24 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-09-06 18:37 ` Marcus Osdoba
2010-09-07 6:03 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-07 21:55 ` Marcus Osdoba
2010-09-08 7:43 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08 18:36 ` Marcus Osdoba
2010-09-09 6:45 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C845EDE.3010806@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=marcus.osdoba@googlemail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox