From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8A0phOX124084 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:51:44 -0500 Received: from smtp.sauce.co.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F40F15F303 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.sauce.co.nz (smtp.sauce.co.nz [210.48.49.72]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TYA5lZeP8qfgpUH2 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C898149.7050305@sauce.co.nz> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:52:25 +1200 From: Richard Scobie MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS over LVM over md RAID References: <4C89668E.6010800@sauce.co.nz> <201009100225.55562@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: <201009100225.55562@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Monnerie Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Michael Monnerie wrote: > FWIW, a stripe set of 256k means you do read/write 256k from a single > drive on each I/O, then the next 256k from the next drive. I hope you > have very few small accesses and mostly very large files. If you'd use a > database on that system it would crawl... Mostly > 2MB and multi GB. Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs