From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8GLqISV018652 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:52:18 -0500 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B3A0F1D8A736 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:53:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EmT84ETV5Rlwd4sD for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:53:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E1F6C0B8 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:53:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4C9291C3.7000709@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:53:07 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LWN.net article: creating 1 billion files -> Tests we did References: <201008191312.49346@zmi.at> <20100916121350.3ab30ca5@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: <20100916121350.3ab30ca5@harpe.intellique.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac put forth on 9/16/2010 5:13 AM: > Test run on a dual Opteron quad core, 16 GB RAM, kernel 2.6.32.11 > x86_64... This is a test of storage system performance, and you left out the storage array specs? By doing so it seems you're stating the underlying storage is not relevant to the results. So, are you saying I should be able to duplicate your results with that dual Opty system, but using an md RAID0 stripe over 8x2TB SATA disks connected to two $60 4 port SiI 3124 PCIe x1 cards? -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs