public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:09:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC6C4E8.6010409@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026132505.6af29d5d@harpe.intellique.com>

Hi,

thanks for your suggestions.

 > My other advices : generally don't use cfq scheduler with a RAID
 > controller, it will defeat the whole purpose of RAID cache and command
 > reordering abilities. Use noop, generally, and deepen the queue :
 >
 > echo "noop">  /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler
 > echo 512>  /sys/block/sdc/queue/nr_requests

Is there a way to make this static to this disk?

 > Don't hesitate to enlarge tremendously the read-ahead cache, too. I
 > generally use about 512 to 1024 sectors  per drive as a rule of the
 > thumb, so a 4 drives array will use 2048 to 4096 :
 >
 > blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdc
Is there also a way to make this static?

 > You should see a 100% write/read speed improvement with these
 > parameters.
That would be great.


Thanks Stefan

Am 26.10.2010 13:25, schrieb Emmanuel Florac:
> Le Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:03:07 +0200
> Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG<s.priebe@profihost.ag>  écrivait:
>
>> it is a 9650SE-8LPML with Firmware: FE9X 3.06.00.003.
>
> Augh, this firmware is antique :) The latest is 4.10.xx.xx. Anyway,
> don't use firmware before 3.08.xx.xx, there were some nasty bugs.
>
>> So you mean i should upgrade to 4.x Firmware?
>
> Definitely. It will much improve performances, too. Simply download the
> firmware file, extract it, and flash the controller with tw_cli :
>
> tw_cli /cXX update fw=prom0006.img
>
> (the firmware is always in the prom00xx.img file).
>
>> Do i then have to do a
>> filesystem repair? Or just wait if the error accours again?
>
> No, the filesystem will be fine. However you should start a RAID scrub
> with
>
> tw_cli /cXX/uXX start verify
>
> This will rebuild the parity with the new 4.X format (faster writes)
> and help detect any hardware fault.
>
> My other advices : generally don't use cfq scheduler with a RAID
> controller, it will defeat the whole purpose of RAID cache and command
> reordering abilities. Use noop, generally, and deepen the queue :
>
> echo "noop">  /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler
> echo 512>  /sys/block/sdc/queue/nr_requests
>
> Don't hesitate to enlarge tremendously the read-ahead cache, too. I
> generally use about 512 to 1024 sectors  per drive as a rule of the
> thumb, so a 4 drives array will use 2048 to 4096 :
>
> blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdc
>
> You should see a 100% write/read speed improvement with these
> parameters.
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-26 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-26  6:25 Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-26  7:22 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26  7:24   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-26  7:41     ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26  7:53       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-26 11:01         ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26 11:03           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-26 11:25             ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26 12:09               ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2010-10-26 13:00                 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26 23:23               ` Michael Monnerie
2010-10-27  3:55                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-27 10:58                   ` Michael Monnerie
2010-10-27 20:59                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-28  9:39                       ` Michael Monnerie
2010-10-27  6:04                 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-27  7:00                   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-27 10:06                     ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-27 10:08                       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-27 10:12                         ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-27 10:22                           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-10-27 11:14                             ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-26 11:30             ` Larsen, Tore Høivaag
2010-10-26 11:47               ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-01  8:01     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-11-01 10:11       ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-01 10:28         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-11-01 12:27       ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-01 12:28         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2010-11-01 12:52           ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-01 13:29           ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-01 13:48             ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC6C4E8.6010409@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox